1-2 Thessalonians: Looking Forward

Sources: I. Howard Marshall et al., Exploring the New Testament: A Guide to the Letters and Revelation (IVP, 2002); Raymond E. Brown, The New Testament: an Introduction (Doubleday, 1997); Bart Ehrman, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, 3d ed. (Oxford, 2004).

I. We've Got Mail: Literary Forms and the Relationships They Reflect
The middle of the (missional) New Testament is Paul's collected (missional) letters to churches.
They generally conform to the Hellenistic letter format:
opening formula (sender, addressee, greeting, health wish — 1 Th 1:1),
thanksgiving to the gods (or God — 1:2-5?),
body or message (opening, middle, closing — 1:6?-5:22),
concluding formula (e.g., greeting, doxology, signature — 5:23-28).
'Form criticism' studies the way set forms shape and convey information.
A literary form (even a bank check) reveals a kind of relationship.
Paul's use of the form demonstrates his investment in the Thessalonian believers:
a parent’s relief and anxiety for his children’s well-being (1 Th 3:6-10),
and a mama bear's righteous indignation at persecutors (2 Th 1:3-12).
Why the starker tone?
If we are in the same church, aren't we in such relationships too?
II. Major Themes in 1-2 Thessalonians
This is the earliest (or nearly so) picture we have of a Pauline church.
(Luke-Acts supplies supporting contextual material in Acts 17:1-15.)
Major themes in both letters:
Prayer (openings, closing, topic transitions) is vital to the church's well-being and Paul's ministry.
The gospel preached brings opposition,
but received in the Spirit's power it brings dramatic transformation: sanctification (1 Th 4:3).
The church is a profound fellowship with familial dynamics.
Paul uses his characteristic 'indicative-imperative' (1 Th 1-3, then 4-5; 2 Th 1-2:14, 2:15-3:18).
Parenesis: Paul reminds the Thessalonians of what they should already know.
Their faithfulness consists of remembering and practicing it.
The church's ethics resemble Epicurian virtues (labor, obedience, welldoing, sexual restraint, friendship)
but are tighter and more intense, and eschatologically shaped, anticipating vindication and judgment:
Rather than sexual detachment, chastity (1 Th 4:1-8);
rather than Hellenic friendship, philadelphia and mutual encouragement (4:9-12, 4:18, 5:11);
rather than contractual justice, edification (5:11);
not just civil 'good citizenship' but children of light in the midst of darkness (5:1-6).
An unwanted legacy is the trajectory of interpretation of negative comments about Jews in 1 Th 2:14-16.
III. Eschatology in Thessalonica (and here?)
Jesus' parousia is determinative for the futures of both the living and the dead.
In the meantime, Christians must be on their guard against trials and dangers: opposition, confusion, false teaching, discord, immorality.
This is called an 'interim ethic' (cf. Montecito Fire Department).
There is less use of (OT) scripture than some other Pauline letters. Why?
In 2 Thessalonians, Paul also reminds of earlier apocalyptic teaching
(unattested elsewhere in Paul) concerning the 'man of lawlessness' (2 Th 1:5-12? 2:1-15).
This is not original teaching, but has precedents in the OT and Jesus' warnings:
Isaiah 13-14 (King of Babylon), Ezekiel 28 (Prince of Tyre), and Mark 13 (abomination of desolation).
How should we receive his eschatology?
Many arrange these details on a timeline. (Then is 1 Th 4 about “the rapture” that precedes 2 Th’s lawless one?)
They are not mere metaphors, but concern the real world, and continue to resonate even to the present.